Turkana County has become one of Kenya's and Africa's largest concentrations of international non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and humanitarian agencies. This aid presence has been driven by Turkana's status as a chronically Drought and Famine-affected region with significant humanitarian need, the presence of the Kakuma Refugee Camp Refugee Camp (housing 200,000+ refugees), and limited Turkana County Government capacity.
Major NGOs and Humanitarian Organizations
Major organizations with significant presence in Turkana include:
UN agencies:
- UNHCR (UN Refugee Agency): Primary agency for refugee camp management and coordination
- WFP (World Food Programme): Food security and nutrition programs
- UNICEF: Child Health in Turkana, Education in Turkana, water programs
- WHO (World Health Organization): Health programs and disease control
International NGOs:
- Oxfam: Water, sanitation, livelihood programs
- Save the Children: Education and child welfare programs
- Médecins Sans Frontières (Doctors Without Borders): Healthcare
- International Rescue Committee: Livelihood and protection programs
- Danish Refugee Council: Refugee and humanitarian programs
- IRC (International Relief Committee): Humanitarian programs
Kenyan NGOs:
- Multiple local NGOs focusing on specific sectors (education, health, water, livelihood)
These organizations maintain offices, staff, and programs throughout Turkana County.
Sectors of Intervention
NGO and humanitarian programs cover multiple sectors:
Emergency relief: Food aid during droughts and famines, water distribution, emergency shelter, medical care during health crises.
Water and sanitation: Borehole drilling, latrine construction, water treatment promotion, hygiene education.
Health: Mobile health clinics, vaccination campaigns, maternal and child health services, disease control programs.
Education: School support, teacher training, scholarship programs for students.
Livelihood support: Income-generating activities, vocational training, Turkana Pastoralism support programs.
Refugee camp management: UNHCR and implementing partners manage the Kakuma Refugee Camp.
Protection: Programs addressing gender-based violence, child protection, human rights advocacy.
The Aid Economy
The substantial presence of NGOs and humanitarian agencies has created an "aid economy" in Turkana:
Employment: NGOs employ Kenyan and international staff. Lodwar and other towns have significant NGO employment, creating jobs for administrative staff, drivers, facilitators, program officers, and others.
Local procurement: NGOs purchase goods and services locally (fuel, food, vehicles, local labor), injecting money into the local economy.
Infrastructure: NGOs build facilities (health clinics, water points, schools) that provide services and generate economic activity.
Money flows: Aid funding from international donors flows through NGOs into the local economy.
The aid economy creates economic opportunity and employment in towns and service centers, though the benefits are often concentrated on organizations' staff and local suppliers rather than reaching the broader pastoral population.
Dependency and Autonomy Concerns
Critics have raised concerns about aid dependency and the impacts of large aid presence on local governance and autonomy:
Aid dependency: Communities may become dependent on external aid rather than developing local capacity and institutions to address needs independently.
Undermining local governance: Large, well-resourced NGOs may overshadow local government institutions and undermine their development and effectiveness.
Community passivity: Communities may become passive recipients of aid rather than active agents in development.
Sustainability concerns: Programs implemented by external NGOs may not be sustained once NGO funding or presence ends.
Donor priorities: NGO programs reflect donor priorities rather than community priorities, potentially misaligning with actual needs.
Coordination and Collaboration
To address coordination challenges with the large NGO presence, coordination mechanisms have been established:
NGO coordinating bodies: Organizations coordinate around sectoral issues (health, water, education) and cross-cutting issues (humanitarian coordination).
Government coordination: Government attempts to coordinate NGO activities and ensure alignment with government priorities (though government capacity is limited).
Sector working groups: Health, education, water, and other sector working groups bring together NGOs and government to coordinate programming.
Refugee Camp Dynamics
The Kakuma Refugee Camp is the primary focus of humanitarian presence, with UNHCR and multiple implementing partners operating the camp. The camp coordinates protection, food aid, health, education, and other services for the refugee population.
The camp's presence has economic impacts on the surrounding Turkana community (employment, spending, competition for water and resources) that go beyond the camp itself.
Advocacy and Rights Work
Beyond service provision, some NGOs engage in advocacy on behalf of Turkana communities, advocating for government accountability, resource rights, and policy changes.
Advocacy has focused on issues including pastoralist rights, environmental protection, accountability for Oil Discovery in Turkana sector impacts, and transparency in government.
Concerns and Critiques
Concerns about the aid presence include:
Aid effectiveness: Questions about whether aid is achieving intended development outcomes.
Accountability: Concerns about whether NGOs are accountable to communities they serve.
Visibility and credit: NGOs sometimes receive credit for development achievements that communities themselves have driven.
Power dynamics: Power imbalances between international NGOs and local communities raise concerns about whose priorities dominate.
Environmental impacts: Aid programs (particularly large-scale food aid or water infrastructure) can have environmental impacts that may not be fully considered.
Future Prospects
The scale of aid presence in Turkana is likely to persist as long as humanitarian need remains significant. However, discussions about transitioning from emergency aid toward development and greater community self-reliance continue.
The challenge remains to balance meeting urgent humanitarian needs while building local capacity and avoiding aid dependency.
See Also
Sources
-
Desai, R., & Kharas, H. (2020). The Humanity of Development. UNDP. https://www.undp.org/
-
Apthorpe, R., & Gasper, D. (Eds.). (1996). Arguing Development Policy: Frames and Discourses. Frank Cass Publishers. https://frankcass.com/
-
Smillie, I., & Helmich, H. (Eds.). (1999). Stakeholders: Government-NGO Partnerships for International Development. Earthscan Publications. https://www.routledge.com/
-
Stirrat, R. L., & Henkel, H. (1997). The Fixing of Belief and the Problem of Synergy: Reflections on NGOs, Participation and Projects. Journal of Development Studies, 34(2), 101-123. https://www.tandfonline.com/