Moi Era Corruption Economy

Overview

The Daniel arap Moi presidency (1978-2002) was characterized by systematic, institutionalized corruption. The "Moi corruption economy" operated as a planned system where corrupt proceeds were distributed to political loyalists to maintain political support. Corruption was not aberrant but was central to the political economy of the regime.

Systematic Corruption as Political Strategy

Moi's regime used corruption as an explicit political tool. Access to corruption opportunities was allocated based on political loyalty to the regime. Individuals and groups loyal to Moi had access to government contracts, land allocation, and preferential business treatment. Those outside the patronage system were excluded from these opportunities.

This created a "political economy of belonging" where ethnic groups, regions, and individuals close to the regime benefited materially from corruption while those distant from power remained excluded. The system was durable because it created a constituency of beneficiaries with interest in maintaining the regime.

The Goldenberg Scandal

The Goldenberg scandal was the most notorious corruption case of the Moi era. Between approximately 1990-1993, a phony gold and diamond export scheme was operated with the knowledge and complicity of senior government officials. Goldenberg International was allocated export credit guarantees worth billions of shillings for gold and diamonds that did not exist.

The scheme involved: (1) creation of fraudulent export paperwork, (2) allocation of export credit guarantees, (3) transfer of funds to the firm and its owners, (4) distribution of proceeds to government officials. The total loss was estimated at USD 600-700 million.

Goldenberg became a symbol of Moi-era corruption because it showed corruption at the highest levels of government, involved massive theft, and persisted for years without being stopped by legitimate oversight mechanisms.

Parastatal Looting

State-owned enterprises (parastatals) were systematically looted during the Moi era. Managers extracted personal benefits through: (1) inflated salaries and perquisites, (2) theft of goods produced by the parastatal, (3) award of contracts to connected suppliers at inflated prices.

Parastatals like Kenya Cooperative Union, Cotton Lint and Seed Marketing Board, and others operated at chronic losses. Their capital was depleted. Some were eventually closed after becoming insolvent, with losses borne by the government.

The looting of parastatals represented a transfer of public assets into private hands.

Land Distribution and Accumulation

Land was allocated through the government as a patronage mechanism. Government officials and politically connected individuals received allocations of public land at nominal or no cost. This land was titled to them, converting public assets into private property.

The allocation of land created a class of government-connected landowners who used their property holdings as wealth storage and as collateral for credit.

Business Licensing and Monopoly Grants

Government licensing authority was used to allocate business monopolies and preferential business opportunities to regime loyalists. A businessman could obtain an import monopoly for a commodity if he had connections to the government. Competing businesses would be excluded through licensing denial.

These monopolies allowed the licensee to charge high prices and extract monopoly rents. The government benefited from corruption payments; the monopolist benefited from monopoly rents; ordinary consumers paid higher prices.

Civil Service Expansion

Civil service employment expanded during the Moi era as a patronage mechanism. Politically loyal individuals were hired into government positions regardless of whether the positions were necessary. This provided income to political loyalists and created a constituency of government employees dependent on the regime.

The oversized civil service was inefficient and contributed to government budget deficits.

Foreign Exchange Control and Corruption

The government maintained tight control over foreign exchange during much of the Moi era. Access to foreign currency was allocated based on political connections rather than based on economic need. This created opportunities for corruption where officials sold foreign exchange allocations to the highest bidder.

Businesses needed foreign currency to purchase imported inputs. The corruption in foreign exchange allocation increased business costs.

International Debt Accumulation

During the Moi era, Kenya accumulated substantial international debt. Some debt was incurred for legitimate infrastructure investment. However, much debt financed theft and corruption. External borrowing provided foreign currency that was stolen rather than invested.

By the end of the Moi era, Kenya's debt was burdensome and contributed to IMF/World Bank conditionality that limited government policy autonomy.

Our Kenya

Explorer