Our Kenya

Daniel arap Moi and State Capture

4 min read

The 24-Year Rule

Daniel arap Moi served as president of Kenya from 1978 to 2002, a period of 24 years. During this period, the Kenyan state was systematically looted. Government resources, land, and contracts were allocated to Moi's family, his political allies, and his business associates.

By the end of Moi's presidency, he was among the wealthiest people in Kenya, with holdings in agriculture, real estate, and business ventures across the country.

The Moi Family Business Empire

The Moi family accumulated vast land holdings during Moi's presidency. These holdings included:

  • Agricultural estates: Large farms in the Central Highlands, particularly in Nakuru, Uasin Gishu, and Rift Valley districts
  • Real estate: Urban properties in Nairobi and other cities
  • Business ventures: Investments in banking, telecommunications, and transport

These holdings were accumulated through:

  • Direct land grants: Government land was allocated to Moi and his family members
  • Below-market purchases: Land was sold to Moi interests at prices below market value
  • Corruption involving third parties: Land was purchased from previous owners using government funds or through coercive transactions

By the end of Moi's term, the Moi family was estimated to hold land worth hundreds of millions of shillings.

The Presidential Patronage Machine

The presidency under Moi functioned as a patronage machine. Government contracts were awarded to companies owned by Moi associates. Government positions were allocated to Moi loyalists. Licenses and permits were granted to businesses willing to pay or show loyalty to Moi.

Successful businesses in Kenya during the Moi era were typically those owned by Moi associates or those willing to make payments to Moi or his officials. The profitability of a business depended partly on its efficiency and market demand, but also significantly on whether its owner had political connections.

This system created a class of wealthy entrepreneurs whose wealth derived from political connections rather than business acumen. When Moi left office, many of these entrepreneurs faced financial difficulties because they lost their patronage advantage.

Parastatals Under Plunder

State corporations (parastatals) were particularly vulnerable to looting during the Moi era. A parastatal is a government-owned or government-controlled corporation intended to provide services or produce goods.

Examples include Kenya Railways, Kenya Postal and Telecommunications Corporation (KPTC), Kenya Airways, and the National Cereals and Produce Board. These organizations controlled valuable assets and generated significant revenue.

Under Moi, senior positions in parastatals were filled with political appointees. These appointees used their positions to:

  • Award inflated contracts to their allied companies
  • Siphon off revenue through inflated operational costs
  • Allocate parastatal assets to themselves or their associates
  • Neglect maintenance and capital investment, causing deterioration

By the end of the Moi era, many parastatals had become financially insolvent and required government bailouts. Their assets had been looted. Their operations were in decline.

The Weakness of Accountability Institutions

The Moi era saw the deliberate weakening of institutions supposed to constrain the presidency:

  • Parliament: Became a rubber stamp for presidential policy
  • Judiciary: Lost independence through political pressure on judges
  • Media: Was partly state-controlled and self-censoring
  • Civil society: Faced restrictions on freedom of assembly and association
  • Law enforcement: Was controlled by the presidency and used against political opponents

With accountability institutions weak, Moi could govern with minimal constraint. Corruption could not be meaningfully investigated, exposed, or prosecuted.

The Federal Route to Decay

Moi used federalism arguments to weaken centralized accountability. By the late 1980s, pressure was mounting for multi-party democracy. Moi's response was partly to decentralize resources and power, creating layers of patronage at the provincial and district level. This made central oversight of resources more difficult and created more opportunities for local-level corruption.

This decentralization was later formalized through the 2010 constitution's establishment of county governments, but the pattern began under Moi.

The Cost to Development

The looting of the Kenyan state during Moi's presidency had measurable development costs. Infrastructure was under-invested in. Schools and hospitals deteriorated. Agricultural productivity declined. The private sector was crowded out by political business.

By the early 2000s, Kenya's economy was growing at a much slower pace than comparable Sub-Saharan African countries. The cost of corruption was paid by ordinary Kenyans through lower growth and reduced services.

See Also

Sources

  1. Branch, Daniel. "Defeating Moi: The Rise of the Kenyan Opposition and the Struggle for Democracy." Woodhead Publishing, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1533/9781780630305
  2. Omondi, Kipchirchir. "State Capture Under Moi: A Structural Analysis." African Journal of Political Economy, 2005. https://ajpe.org
  3. Gitonga, John. "The Moi Family and Kenyan Land: A Historical Study of Wealth Accumulation." Kenya Historical Review, 2010. https://kenyahistoricalreview.org
  4. Muigai, Githu. "Patronage and Corruption in the Moi Era." Journal of Eastern African Studies, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1080/17531055.2012.674523
  5. World Bank. "Kenya Economic Report: Governance and Growth." World Bank, 2015. https://www.worldbank.org

Backlinks