Devolution and Northern Kenya

Kenya's 2010 Constitution devolved substantial government authority and resources to 47 county governments, including three northern counties (Wajir County, Mandera County, Garissa County) that are Somali-majority. Devolution was intended to bring governance closer to local communities and enable localized development. However, implementation has been uneven, county governments face resource constraints and institutional weaknesses, and development gaps have persisted.

Devolution Framework and Constitutional Basis

The 2010 Constitution established a devolved system with two levels of government:

(National government: Retains authority over national security, foreign affairs, national currency, and some economic sectors.)

(County governments: 47 counties with elected governors, county assemblies (legislatures), and significant authority over local development, land management, healthcare, and education.)

Revenue is shared between national and county governments through the Constitutional Commission on Revenue Allocation (CORA), with counties receiving a percentage of national revenue for local expenditure.

Wajir, Mandera, and Garissa counties are among Kenya's largest by land area but smallest by population and economic output, resulting in relatively limited county revenues.

Institutional Capacity and Governance Challenges

County governments in northern Kenya have faced multiple challenges:

Institutional weakness: Many county administrations lack trained personnel, financial management systems, and governance structures necessary for effective service delivery.

Resource constraints: County revenues are limited, constraining ability to fund development projects and provide services.

Corruption and mismanagement: Some county governments have experienced allegations of corruption, misappropriation of funds, and poor financial management.

Staffing challenges: Difficulty attracting skilled professionals to remote counties results in limited technical capacity for project planning and implementation.

Infrastructure deficits: Existing infrastructure is minimal, requiring massive investment before service delivery can improve.

Development Outcomes and Persistent Gaps

Despite devolution's promise, development gaps have persisted:

Healthcare: Wajir, Mandera, and Garissa have limited healthcare infrastructure, doctor shortages, and high maternal and infant mortality rates compared to national averages.

Education: School enrollment and completion rates are lower than national averages; school infrastructure is inadequate in many areas.

Water and sanitation: Access to clean water and improved sanitation is limited, particularly in pastoral areas dependent on seasonal wells and boreholes.

Infrastructure: Roads, electricity, and telecommunications infrastructure are limited compared to other regions.

Economic opportunity: Limited formal employment and business opportunity persist, with pastoralism and small-scale trade remaining primary income sources.

Oil revenues: Oil discoveries in Turkana (south of Garissa) have not yet generated significant revenues benefiting Garissa and other northern counties, partly due to development delays and resource curse dynamics.

County Politics and Governance

Political dynamics at the county level have important implications:

(Gubernatorial elections: County governor races are contested, with Somali clan-affiliated candidates competing for the position and control of county resources.)

(County legislatures: County assemblies (legislatures) consist of elected representatives from county wards, with multiple political parties and individual candidates representing different constituencies and interests.)

(Land and pastoral disputes: County governments have authority over land management and pastoral resource allocation, creating potential for resolving long-standing disputes but also generating political conflicts.)

(Inter-county coordination: Limited coordination exists between county governments on shared issues (water, pastoral management, trade), limiting regional cooperation on development.)

Successes and Positive Examples

Despite challenges, some county initiatives have generated improvements:

(Water projects: Some counties have invested in borehole drilling, tank construction, and water management, improving pastoral water access in specific areas.)

(Healthcare expansion: Some counties have invested in health facility construction and staffing, improving healthcare access beyond what national government had provided.)

(Education projects: Some county governments have supported school construction and teacher recruitment, improving educational access.)

(Roads and infrastructure: Some counties have improved local roads and infrastructure, enabling better market access and economic activity.)

(Disaster response: County governments have sometimes coordinated humanitarian response during droughts and emergencies more effectively than national government.)

Challenges and Frustrations

County governance in northern Kenya faces persistent frustrations:

(Unfulfilled expectations: Devolution promised rapid local development, but improvement has been slow and uneven, frustrating communities with high expectations.)

(Corruption and accountability gaps: Instances of county fund misappropriation and limited accountability mechanisms have generated cynicism about devolution.)

(Central government interference: National government has sometimes interfered in county governance through security operations, appointment of commissioners during emergencies, and resource withholding.)

(Technical limitations: County governments often lack technical expertise for project design, bidding, and implementation, resulting in delayed or poor-quality projects.)

(Political instability: Some county governments have experienced frequent leadership changes or political conflicts that disrupt governance continuity.)

Women and Minority Representation in County Government

Devolution has created some opportunities for women and minorities:

(County representatives: Women have been elected to county assemblies, providing representation beyond national Parliament's reserved seats.)

(Appointed positions: Some county governments have appointed women and minorities to advisory positions, though meaningful influence is often limited.)

(Access points: County government represents a more accessible entry point for political participation compared to national elections.)

However, patriarchal structures and resource constraints continue to limit women's and minorities' full participation.

Future Prospects and Reform Discussions

Recent discussions about devolution reform include:

(Institutional strengthening: Improving county government capacity through training, systems development, and professional staffing.)

(Resource allocation reform: Adjusting revenue-sharing formulas to account for development deficits in less-developed counties.)

(Anti-corruption measures: Implementing stronger accountability mechanisms and fighting corruption in county governments.)

(Regional coordination: Developing mechanisms for inter-county cooperation on shared development and security issues.)

(Service delivery focus: Pushing county governments to prioritize basic service delivery (healthcare, water, education) over political rent-seeking.)

Somali Community Perspectives

Somali community members hold varied perspectives on devolution:

(Hope for development: Many hoped devolution would bring rapid development and improve conditions in neglected regions.)

(Frustration with progress: Slow progress has generated frustration and cynicism about devolution's ability to deliver promised improvements.)

(Appreciation for representation: Some appreciate having Somali governors and county representatives, viewing this as important representation.)

(Clan concerns: Political competition around devolution has intensified clan politics at county level, with some viewing clan-based competition as limiting.)

(Autonomy desires: Some Somali have expressed desire for greater regional autonomy or even separate governance arrangements, though these remain minority views.)

Sources

Constitutional Commission on Revenue Allocation (CORA), "County Revenue Allocation and Development" (Kenya, annual reports), available at https://www.cora.go.ke/
Institute for Public Policy Research, "Devolution in Northern Kenya: Progress and Challenges" (2015), available at https://www.ippr.org/
Transparency International Kenya, "County Governance and Anti-Corruption" (2014-2020 reports), available at https://www.tikenya.org/
UN Habitat, "Local Governance and Development in Pastoral Regions" (2013), examining devolution's impact on pastoral communities, available at https://www.unhabitat.org/

Our Kenya

Explorer