Our Kenya

2007 Election Disputed Results

4 min read

The announcement came on the evening of December 30, 2007, and within hours, Kenya was burning. Samuel Kivuitu, chairman of the Electoral Commission of Kenya, declared Mwai Kibaki the winner of the presidential election with 4.58 million votes against Raila Odinga's 4.35 million. The margin was narrow, the process was chaotic, and the result was immediately contested. Observers, journalists, and opposition agents had documented irregularities: polling stations where turnout exceeded 100%, constituencies where results arrived late with implausibly lopsided tallies, and a rushed announcement that violated the commission's own procedures. Raila rejected the result. International observers expressed serious doubts. The country exploded into the worst violence since independence.

The election had been close from the start. Kibaki, seeking a second term, ran on his record: economic growth, free primary education, and infrastructure development. But his support was concentrated in Kikuyu Central Province and parts of Nairobi. Raila's Orange Democratic Movement drew support from Luo Nyanza, Kalenjin Rift Valley, the Coast, and Western Kenya. The campaign was intense, polarized along ethnic lines, and marked by mutual accusations of rigging plans. Both sides mobilized their bases with warnings that losing would mean exclusion from power and resources.

As results trickled in on December 28 and 29, Raila led in early tallies. His camp was confident. Then the count slowed. Results from Central Province and other Kibaki strongholds arrived in large, late batches. The gap narrowed. By December 30, Kibaki had pulled ahead. The Electoral Commission, under intense pressure from both camps, announced the final result that evening. Kivuitu declared Kibaki the winner and immediately swore him in at State House in a hastily arranged ceremony. The speed was suspicious. Normally, the inauguration would wait days. Kibaki was sworn in within an hour, as if to present the opposition with a fait accompli.

The irregularities were undeniable. In some constituencies, vote tallies announced at polling stations did not match the figures later declared by the Electoral Commission. In Molo, a Rift Valley constituency, turnout was reported at 115%. In Central Province, some results showed Kibaki winning by implausibly large margins. Opposition agents were locked out of tallying centers. Forms were altered. The commission's own procedures were violated. Kivuitu himself would later admit, in a moment of extraordinary candor, that he did not know who had actually won the election.

International observers, including the European Union and the Carter Center, issued statements expressing serious concern. They stopped short of calling the election fraudulent outright, but their language was damning: "the 2007 elections fell short of key international standards." The Kenyan media, particularly investigative journalists, documented the irregularities in detail. The opposition compiled a dossier of evidence. But none of it mattered in the moment. Kibaki was president, backed by the state apparatus, and he was not stepping down.

Raila's response was immediate. He declared the result null and void, calling Kibaki an illegitimate president. He urged his supporters to protest peacefully but did not explicitly call for calm. Within hours, violence erupted in Nairobi's slums, Kisumu, and parts of the Rift Valley. What began as political protests metastasized into ethnic killings, organized militia attacks, and retaliatory violence that would leave over 1,300 dead and 600,000 displaced.

The Electoral Commission of Kenya collapsed as an institution. Kivuitu, who had been respected before the election, became a figure of ridicule and suspicion. The commission was accused of being compromised, incompetent, or both. Subsequent investigations, including the Kriegler Commission, found that the ECK had failed fundamentally in its mandate. The commission was eventually dissolved and replaced by the Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission under the 2010 Constitution.

The disputed result shattered the hope that Kenya's democratic institutions were maturing. The 2002 election had been credible. The 2007 election was a regression, a reminder that when power was at stake, Kenya's political elite would manipulate institutions rather than respect them. The result was not just a political crisis but a legitimacy crisis. Kibaki governed for his second term, but his mandate was poisoned. The power-sharing deal brokered by Kofi Annan gave him legality but not legitimacy.

See Also

Sources

  1. "Kenya: Verify the Vote, Count the Cost," Human Rights Watch, December 2007. https://www.hrw.org
  2. Kriegler Commission Report. "Independent Review Commission on the General Elections held in Kenya in 2007," 2008. http://www.communication.go.ke/
  3. European Union Election Observation Mission. "Kenya Final Report: General Elections 27 December 2007," 2008. https://www.eeas.europa.eu
  4. Branch, Daniel, and Nic Cheeseman. "Democratization, Sequencing, and State Failure in Africa." African Affairs 108, no. 430 (2009). https://academic.oup.com/afraf

Backlinks