Documented cases exist where Kenyans have voted against their ethnic community's preferred candidate, demonstrating that ethnic voting is not absolute and that conditions exist allowing for cross-ethnic political coalition formation. Understanding the conditions under which cross-ethnic voting occurs and its implications for Kenyan democracy is important for assessing possibilities for transcending ethnic politics.
The 2002 presidential election provides significant evidence of cross-ethnic voting. Mwai Kibaki, a Kikuyu candidate running under the NARC (National Rainbow Coalition) coalition, won the 2002 election with support from communities beyond Kikuyu voters. Kalenjin voters, having predominantly supported Daniel arap Moi in previous elections, shifted substantially to Kibaki. Luhya, Luo, and other communities also supported Kibaki. The cross-ethnic coalition that elected Kibaki demonstrated the possibility of transcending ethnic voting patterns.
The conditions enabling the 2002 cross-ethnic coalition included explicit promises of constitutional reform, anti-corruption efforts, and the desire for leadership change. The appeal of these cross-ethnic issues allowed diverse communities to unite behind a candidate despite ethnic considerations. The coalition was explicit, with politicians from different ethnic groups publicly announcing their support for Kibaki.
The subsequent dissolution of the NARC coalition demonstrates the fragility of cross-ethnic political coalitions. Within months of Kibaki's election, the coalition fragments. Politicians from different ethnic groups competed for ministerial positions and resources. Kibaki appointed proportionally more Kikuyu people to his cabinet, contributing to perceptions that he favored his own ethnic group. By 2005, the coalition had effectively dissolved.
The 2007 election saw increased ethnic polarization. Kibaki, retaining office, received concentrated support from Kikuyu voters. Raila Odinga, the chief opposition candidate, received concentrated support from Luo and other communities opposing Kibaki. The 2007 election demonstrates the conditions under which ethnic voting intensifies. When elections are perceived as zero-sum competitions between ethnic groups, voting becomes more explicitly ethnic.
The 2013 and 2017 elections continued patterns of substantial ethnic voting, though some cross-ethnic coalition formation occurred. Uhuru Kenyatta, Kibaki's successor, received concentrated Kikuyu support. Raila Odinga maintained substantial Luo support. Simultaneously, however, some cross-ethnic voting occurred, with some Kikuyu voters supporting Raila and some Luo voters supporting Kenyatta.
The conditions enabling cross-ethnic voting appear to include: clear alternative candidates offering substantially different policy proposals, public confidence in democratic procedures, absence of acute intergroup tensions, and belief in the possibility of peaceful power transition. When these conditions are absent, ethnic voting increases.
See Also
- Electoral Polarization Kenya
- The Luo-Kikuyu Axis
- Ethnic Arithmetic in Politics
- Democratic Transition Kenya
- Coalition Formation Kenya
Sources
-
Wantchekon, L. (2003). Clientelism and Voting Behavior: Evidence from a Field Experiment in Benin. World Politics, 55(3), 399-422. https://doi.org/10.1353/wp.2003.0018
-
Posner, D. N. (2005). Institutions and Ethnic Politics in Africa. Cambridge University Press. https://www.cambridge.org/
-
Horowitz, D. L. (1985). Ethnic Groups in Conflict. University of California Press. https://www.ucpress.edu/