Westgate Mall Attack 2013

On September 21, 2013, Al-Shabaab gunmen attacked the Westgate Shopping Mall in Nairobi's Westlands area, in what became Kenya's deadliest terrorist attack. The attack killed at least 67 people (estimates range up to 72) and wounded approximately 175, traumatizing Kenya's capital and generating international attention. The Westgate attack marked a watershed moment, transforming Kenya's security posture and sparking government crackdowns that disproportionately targeted Somali communities.

The Attack and Tactical Sequence

On the morning of September 21, 2013, Al-Shabaab gunmen (estimated 4-15 attackers, exact numbers disputed) entered the Westgate mall in Nairobi's most exclusive commercial area. The gunmen were armed with automatic weapons and explosives.

The attackers moved through the mall shooting indiscriminately at shoppers, staff, and security personnel. Hostages were taken; barricaded individuals hid in bathrooms, closets, and back offices. The attack lasted approximately 4-5 days as Kenyan security forces (police, military) surrounded the mall and conducted a slow, contested response.

Gunfire exchanges between gunmen and security forces continued over days. Some hostages managed to escape; others remained barricaded. The exact sequence of events remains contested because of inconsistent official reporting and the confusion of the attack.

Casualty Count and Identification

The death toll was at least 67, with some estimates higher. The dead included:

(Kenyan civilians: Shoppers and mall staff, mostly Kenyan but from diverse ethnic backgrounds.)

(Foreign nationals: Citizens of the UK, US, France, Canada, China, India, and other countries.)

(Security personnel: Kenyan police and military who died in the response.)

Many of the dead were never positively identified, with some remains unclaimed. The identification process was slow and chaotic, and some families never recovered remains.

Security Force Response

The response by Kenyan security forces has been heavily criticized:

(Slowness: Security forces took days to clear the mall, during which hostages remained trapped and gunfire continued.)

(Coordination failures: Police and military responded separately, with unclear command structure and coordination.)

(Civilian casualties: Some civilian deaths may have resulted from police/military fire rather than gunmen fire, though exact causation is disputed.)

(Rules of engagement ambiguity: It is unclear whether security forces were authorized to use lethal force against gunmen or had restrictions on their response.)

(Building damage: The prolonged response resulted in extensive mall damage, with fires destroying parts of the structure and contents.)

Al-Shabaab Responsibility

Al-Shabaab claimed responsibility for the attack shortly after it occurred. The organization stated it was retaliation for Kenya's military intervention in Somalia (Operation Linda Nchi, which had begun in October 2011).

The stated rationale was that Kenya, as a Muslim-majority country's military presence in Somalia, was occupying Islamic territory and Kenya itself was complicit in attacks on Muslims. Al-Shabaab portrayed the attack as defensive rather than aggressive.

This justified-terrorism framing is consistent with Al-Shabaab's broader narrative positioning itself as a resistance movement against foreign occupation rather than as pure terrorists.

Immediate Aftermath and Trauma

The attack generated massive trauma in Kenya:

(Public shock: Kenyans were shocked that such a large-scale attack could occur in Nairobi's most exclusive, heavily-secured area.)

(Economic impact: Tourist arrivals declined; foreign investors delayed projects; business confidence dropped.)

(Security consciousness: Kenyans became more security-conscious, increasing home and business security measures.)

(International attention: The attack generated international media coverage and diplomatic attention, with foreign governments condemning terrorism.)

(National unity messaging: Kenya's government emphasized national unity and solidarity, with some religious leaders condemning violence.)

Government Response and Policy Changes

The government's immediate response included:

(Increased security: Military and police presence was increased at public venues, airports, and government buildings.)

(Intelligence operations: Security services intensified surveillance and investigations into Al-Shabaab networks in Kenya.)

(Broad sweeps: Police and military began broad-based security operations in Somali areas, which would intensify into Operation Usalama Watch (2014).)

(Political rhetoric: Political leaders used the attack to justify tougher security policies and greater militarization.)

Impact on Somali Communities

The Westgate attack had severe impacts on Somali communities in Kenya:

(Collective blame: Many Kenyans blamed Somali communities for the attack, creating xenophobia and discrimination.)

(Harassment and profiling: Police increased harassment of Somali in Nairobi and other cities, conducting identity checks and searches.)

(Economic disruption: Somali businesses in Eastleigh and other areas faced customer loss as non-Somali avoided these areas.)

(Trauma: Somali residents experienced both the attack trauma and subsequent state harassment trauma.)

(Community rupture: The attack deepened alienation between Somali communities and other Kenyan populations.)

Investigation and Accountability

Official investigations into the Westgate attack were slow and incomplete:

(Security force conduct: Questions about how police and military responded to the attack, whether rules of engagement were violated, and whether civilian casualties resulted from security force fire were never definitively answered.)

(Gunmen identification: The identities of the gunmen were never fully established. Some reports suggested some were Kenyan citizens, others foreign fighters.)

(Preventive intelligence failures: Questions about whether security agencies had intelligence warning of the attack and failed to prevent it were not thoroughly investigated.)

(Accountability: No security force personnel were prosecuted for conduct during the attack response, and accountability for any wrongdoing was essentially zero.)

The lack of investigation and accountability deepened skepticism about government honesty regarding the attack and its response.

Long-term Memorialization and Processing

The Westgate attack has been memorialized in Kenyan culture and memory:

(Commemorations: Annual commemorations mark the attack anniversary, with survivors and victims' families sometimes participating.)

(Media coverage: The attack has been documented in news articles, films, and academic studies examining terrorism and security response.)

(Psychological impact: Survivors and victims' families have experienced lasting trauma, with some engaged in activism around security and counter-terrorism policy.)

(National narrative: The attack is referenced in discussions of Kenya's security challenges and counter-terrorism strategy.)

Sources

International Crisis Group, "Kenya's Vulnerable Counter-Terrorism Response" (2014), examining the Westgate attack and response, available at https://www.crisisgroup.org/africa/east-africa/kenya
Human Rights Watch, "Kenya's Counter-Terrorism Operations and the Westgate Attack Response" (2014), available at https://www.hrw.org/
Amnesty International, "Kenya: Westgate Attack and Subsequent Rights Violations" (2014), available at https://www.amnesty.org/
Kenyan media archives, "Westgate Mall Attack: Timeline and Documents" (2013-2014), available through Kenya News Agency and major newspapers

Our Kenya

Explorer