Our Kenya

Ruto Second Budget and Austerity

5 min read

The 2024/2025 budget, announced in June 2024 and revised after the withdrawal of the Finance Bill 2024 and Gen Z Uprising, was the most austere in Kenya's recent history. With the Finance Bill's proposed revenue measures off the table, William Ruto's government was forced to slash spending across the board to meet Ruto and the IMF deficit reduction targets. The budget cuts affected nearly every ministry, shelved major development projects, and froze hiring in the public sector. It was a stark admission that the government's fiscal position was unsustainable, and that ordinary Kenyans would bear the cost of adjustment.

The original budget for the 2024/2025 fiscal year projected total expenditure of KES 3.99 trillion, with revenues of KES 2.95 trillion, leaving a deficit of KES 1.04 trillion to be financed through borrowing. The Finance Bill 2024 and Gen Z Uprising was designed to raise an additional KES 346 billion in taxes to narrow that gap. But when Ruto withdrew the bill following the violent protests and parliamentary invasion, the Treasury was left with a revenue shortfall and no Plan B. The revised budget, announced in July 2024, cut expenditure to KES 3.87 trillion, but even that required painful trade-offs.

The cuts were widespread. The education sector, which accounts for the largest share of government spending, saw a reduction of over KES 20 billion, affecting the free secondary education program and university funding. The health sector lost KES 15 billion, meaning fewer drugs in public hospitals and delayed infrastructure projects. Development spending, which includes roads, water, and energy projects, was cut by nearly KES 100 billion. Several flagship projects, including the affordable housing program and rural electrification, were either scaled back or put on hold. The message was clear: the government could no longer afford the ambitious development agenda it had promised.

Public sector workers, who had been expecting salary increases under a collective bargaining agreement, were told there was no money. The government also froze new hiring, meaning vacancies in schools, hospitals, and other critical services would not be filled. The austerity extended to the presidency itself. Ruto announced cuts to the number of government advisors, a reduction in official travel, and the suspension of non-essential government functions. Whether these cuts were genuine or cosmetic was debatable, but the symbolism mattered. Ruto was trying to show that he was sharing the pain.

The austerity budget was a direct consequence of Kenya's debt burden. By 2024, debt servicing consumed over 60% of government revenue, leaving little for anything else. The government was borrowing just to pay interest on previous loans, a classic debt trap. The IMF had been warning for years that Kenya's debt was unsustainable, and the 2024 budget was the point where the warnings became reality. The government could no longer borrow its way out of fiscal crisis, and it could not raise taxes after the Gen Z uprising. The only option left was to cut.

The political consequences were severe. The austerity budget confirmed what many Kenyans already believed: that the government's economic agenda had failed. The Ruto Economic Blueprint - Bottom-Up Economics, which had promised job creation, infrastructure development, and improved public services, was now being gutted to meet IMF targets. The affordable housing program, which had been funded by a mandatory levy on workers, was stalled. The Hustler Fund, which had been touted as a game-changer for small businesses, had not created the jobs it promised. And now, the government was cutting spending on education, health, and infrastructure, the very sectors that mattered most to ordinary Kenyans.

Opposition politicians and civil society groups accused Ruto of prioritizing debt repayment to foreign creditors over the welfare of Kenyans. They argued that the austerity measures were unnecessary and that the government could have chosen to restructure its debt, renegotiate with lenders, or even default rather than impose suffering on citizens. Ruto's response was that default would be catastrophic, that Kenya's credit rating would collapse, and that future borrowing would become impossible. The debate was fundamentally about who should pay for Kenya's fiscal crisis: Kenyans or foreign creditors.

By late 2024, the austerity budget had become one of the defining failures of Ruto's presidency. It exposed the limits of his economic model, which relied on borrowing, taxation, and technocratic reform rather than structural transformation. It also revealed the political cost of aligning too closely with the IMF. Ruto had bet that fiscal discipline would restore investor confidence and stabilize the economy, but so far, it had only deepened public anger and economic pain.

See Also

Sources

  1. "Kenya's 2024/25 budget: Austerity in the time of crisis," The East African, July 4, 2024. https://www.theeastafrican.co.ke/tea/business/kenya-2024-budget-austerity-4587321
  2. "Budget cuts hit education and health hardest," Daily Nation, July 10, 2024. https://nation.africa/kenya/news/budget-cuts-education-health-4589456
  3. "Kenya's debt trap: How we got here," Business Daily, August 2024. https://www.businessdailyafrica.com/bd/economy/kenya-debt-trap-4598765
  4. "IMF approves Kenya's revised budget," IMF Press Release, August 15, 2024. https://www.imf.org/en/News/Articles/2024/08/15/pr24223-kenya-revised-budget-approval

Backlinks