Uhuru 2017 Election

The 2017 Kenyan presidential election was the most tumultuous electoral cycle since the country's transition to multiparty democracy. Uhuru Kenyatta sought reelection against Raila Odinga, but the election was invalidated by Kenya's Supreme Court on technical grounds, a continental first. A re-run was held under opposition boycott, leaving profound questions about democratic legitimacy.

First Election, August 2017

The August 8, 2017 election saw Uhuru's Jubilee coalition contest against Raila's NASA (National Super Alliance). Polling suggested a close race. Uhuru campaigned on development achievements (particularly the SGR), while Raila argued for inclusivity and redistribution.

Results announced by the Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission (IEBC) showed Uhuru winning with 54.27 percent against Raila's 44.74 percent. Jubilee also retained parliamentary control. However, within hours of the result announcement, irregularities emerged: numerical discrepancies, unclear transmission procedures, and allegations of tampering.

Raila immediately rejected the results, claiming systemic fraud. He alleged that results had been hacked, that IEBC commissioners had been pressured, and that the election lacked transparency. The allegations, though disputed by IEBC and Uhuru's team, were credible enough that observers and international community called for investigation.

Supreme Court Invalidation

In an unprecedented move, Kenya's Supreme Court agreed to hear Raila's election petition. The court conducted a substantive review of IEBC procedures and evidence. On September 1, 2017, the court made a historic ruling: it annulled the election on grounds that the IEBC had not followed constitutional procedures for verifying and transmitting results.

This was the first time an African court had nullified a presidential election result. The ruling was momentous: it demonstrated that Kenya's 2010 constitution had created genuine institutional checks on executive power. It also enraged Uhuru's supporters, who viewed the court as overreaching and siding with the opposition.

The court's decision reflected genuine constitutional concerns (the IEBC had indeed failed to follow proper procedure for result verification), but it also occurred within a highly politicized environment. Some analysts argued that the court was responding to international pressure and opposition mobilization rather than purely legal grounds.

Political Crisis and Re-run Election

The court's invalidation created a constitutional crisis. The Jubilee government dismissed the court's reasoning, with Uhuru declaring that the court had been captured by external interests (particularly the international community and foreign governments). The court's legitimacy was questioned in some quarters, and several judges received death threats.

Over the following weeks, negotiations occurred around conditions for a re-run. The opposition demanded IEBC reforms, particularly removal of commissioners. The government resisted but eventually agreed to limited reforms. A new election date of October 26, 2017 was set.

However, the opposition, viewing the initial result as fraudulent and conditions for a fair re-run as unmet, announced a boycott of the October election. Raila declared that he would not participate and instead called for a "national dialogue" to address systemic issues.

October Re-run Election

The October 26 re-run proceeded without significant opposition participation. Voter turnout collapsed to approximately 39 percent (from 80 percent in August). Uhuru's vote count fell to 3.2 million (from 3.9 million in August). In absolute terms, he lost votes, but in the compressed electorate, his vote share remained dominant at 98 percent of votes cast (since Raila had withdrawn).

The re-run was technically valid but lacked democratic legitimacy. A president returned to office by less than 40 percent of registered voters, with opposition boycott, could not claim a strong popular mandate. Uhuru's second term would be shadowed by questions about legitimacy and democratic process.

Consequences and Unresolved Questions

The 2017 election cycle revealed fragility in Kenya's democratic institutions. It showed that even with 2010 constitutional safeguards, electoral credibility rested on institutional capacity and political will to uphold rules. The Supreme Court's boldness was admirable but ultimately circumscribed: it could invalidate but not ensure a more legitimate outcome.

The election did not resolve underlying political tensions. Within months, Uhuru initiated the "handshake" with Raila, suggesting recognition that political stabilization required elite negotiation rather than electoral resolution. The 2017 election exposed the limits of competitive elections in a highly polarized society.

The IEBC learned institutional lessons but confidence in electoral administration remained shaken. International observers, including the UN and AU, expressed concern about processes. Kenya's reputation as the region's most stable democracy took a hit.

Legacy and Impact

The 2017 election cycle was transformative for Uhuru's presidency. His second term began under a cloud. The Supreme Court's invalidation had energized opposition activism and signaled that courts would check executive overreach. The re-run's low legitimacy meant Uhuru's second agenda (the Big Four, BBI) faced skepticism.

The cycle also contributed to Uhuru's later pivot toward Raila (the handshake), as he sought political stabilization through elite consensus rather than electoral competition. In this sense, 2017 set the stage for the subsequent political realignment that would define his presidency's final years.

---

See Also

• 2013 Kenyan Election
• Supreme Court of Kenya
• Raila Odinga
• Jubilee Party
• Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission
• Post-Election Violence (2007-2008)
• Kenyan Constitution 2010
• Uhuru Handshake

Sources

1. Supreme Court of Kenya (2017). "Petition No. 1 of 2017: In Re: The Matter of the Elections Held on 8th August 2017." https://www.supremecourt.go.ke/
2. International Crisis Group (2018). "Kenya: The 2017 Elections and Beyond." https://www.crisisgroup.org/
3. Observer Mission Report (2017). "The August and October 2017 Kenyan Elections." https://www.election-observers.org/
4. Standard Media (2017). "Supreme Court Nullifies Election: Kenya's Democratic Moment." https://www.standardmedia.co.ke/