Our Kenya

Maasai_County_Governance

6 min read

Devolution Context

Kenya's 2010 constitution introduced devolution, creating 47 county governments with significant autonomy over local development, budgets, and service delivery. The Maasai heartland is primarily encompassed by two counties: Narok and Kajiado, with smaller Maasai populations in Samburu, Laikipia County, and Bomet counties. Devolution was intended to bring government closer to communities and allow for localized development policies responsive to regional needs.

Narok County

Narok County, covering approximately 17,000 square kilometers, is the larger of the two primary Maasai counties. The county is home to [[../Conservation/Maasai Maasai Mara National Reserve National Reserve|Maasai Mara National Reserve]] National Reserve, which generates substantial tourism revenue. Narok County has a diverse economy: pastoral livestock in lower-rainfall areas, agriculture in higher-rainfall regions, and tourism centered on the Mara. The county capital, Narok Town, serves as a commercial hub for the region.

Kajiado County

Kajiado County, covering approximately 21,000 square kilometers, extends from the Tanzania border northward to the outskirts of Nairobi. The county is less economically diverse than Narok, with predominantly pastoral economy in the south and increasing peri-urban development around Kajiado Town as Nairobi expands. Kajiado borders Nairobi directly, making it subject to intense urbanization pressures and land speculation.

Gubernatorial Leadership

Both counties are led by elected governors with five-year terms. The governors control substantial budgets (typically KES 5-15 billion annually) and direct development priorities. Narok and Kajiado counties have had multiple governors since devolution began in 2013. Quality of governance has varied significantly. Some governors have focused on pastoral development and community empowerment, while others have prioritized urban development and commercial interests that sometimes conflict with pastoral communities.

County Assembly Representation

Each county has a county assembly with elected representatives from electoral wards. The assemblies pass county laws (county ordinances), approve budgets, and exercise oversight over the governor and county government. Maasai communities elect assembly representatives who are supposed to advocate for pastoral interests, education, healthcare, and other local priorities. However, assembly effectiveness varies, and corruption or self-interested representation sometimes undermines accountability.

Devolution Impact on Service Delivery

Devolution was intended to improve healthcare, education, and infrastructure service delivery in pastoral regions. In theory, counties could prioritize investments responsive to local needs. In practice, service delivery improvements have been uneven. Some counties have expanded health facilities in pastoral areas; others have not. Education remains a priority, but quality and access vary. Road infrastructure has improved in some areas but remains inadequate in others, particularly in remote pastoral territories.

Tourism Revenue and Distribution

Narok County's Maasai Mara generates enormous tourism revenue. International tourists pay bed-night fees (typically USD 50-300 per person per night) to stay in lodge and conservancy accommodations. The county government collects local authority levies from these operations. However, the amount reaching the county government is relatively modest compared to total tourism revenue. Most revenue flows to lodge operators, conservancy owners, and conservation organizations. Tourism benefit-sharing remains contentious, with many Maasai communities arguing they receive inadequate returns from their wildlife resources.

Pastoral Development Policies

Some counties have adopted pastoral development policies and established pastoral divisions within county governments. These policies attempt to improve pastoral productivity, provide drought relief, manage rangeland health, and support livestock marketing. However, pastoral development often competes with agricultural development priorities in county budgets. Urban-focused governors sometimes minimize pastoral investment, viewing pastoralism as economically backward.

Land Management and Conservancies

Counties have responsibility for land management within their borders. Narok County has had to manage conflicts between national park expansion, community conservancies, and pastoral communities. Kajiado County has had to address rapid land subdivision and urban expansion while attempting to preserve pastoral territories. Some county governments have been supportive of community conservancies as a model combining pastoral and conservation interests; others have not.

Coordination with National Government

County governments operate within a federal system where the national government retains control over major resources, security, and national development policy. This creates coordination challenges. National government decisions about national parks, land policy, or taxation can override county government preferences. The relationship between county and national governments has sometimes been contentious, particularly when governors from opposition political parties control counties while a different party controls the presidency.

Political Representation and KANU Dominance

Narok and Kajiado counties have historically been strongholds of KANU (Kenya African National Union), the party that governed Kenya from independence until 2002. KANU's dominance in Maasai areas reflected both historical association (Kenyatta's KANU was credited with independence) and because KANU organized itself effectively in pastoral regions. In recent elections, political competition has increased, with other parties (Jubilee, NASA, UDA) contesting Maasai constituencies.

Governance Challenges

Both counties face governance challenges. Corruption is a significant issue, with budget misappropriation reported in both counties. Infrastructure projects often face delays or quality issues. Service delivery has improved in some areas but remains inadequate in others. Transparency and accountability mechanisms are sometimes weak. Public participation in decision-making varies, with some counties more responsive to community input than others.

Women and Youth Representation

Devolution provided new opportunities for women and youth representation through reserved assembly seats and youth development agendas. Some county governments have actively promoted women and youth participation in decision-making. Others have been less responsive. In Maasai pastoral culture, where elder men traditionally dominated decision-making, the inclusion of women and youth in county governance represents a significant shift.

Donor Support and Development Partners

Both Narok and Kajiado counties receive support from international development partners (World Bank, bilateral donors, NGOs) for specific projects and programs. This external support has funded healthcare facilities, education programs, and pastoral development initiatives. However, donor priorities sometimes diverge from local priorities, and donor-funded projects sometimes do not sustain once external funding ends.

Future Challenges

Both counties face ongoing challenges: climate change impacts on pastoral lands, urban pressure particularly in Kajiado, wildlife conservation pressures in Narok, and need for economic diversification. County governments are attempting to address these challenges through development planning, but their capacity is often limited. Success will depend on both county government performance and national government support for pastoral development and land rights.

See Also

Sources

  1. Throup, David and Hornsby, Charles. "A History of Kenya." Oxford University Press, 1998. https://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198275541.001.0001
  2. Waller, Richard D. "Land Tenure, the State, and Pastoral Ecology in Kenya." African Journal of Ecology, Vol. 34, Supplement 1, 1996, pp. 17-32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2028.1996.tb00603.x
  3. World Bank. "Kenya Economic Update: The World Turned Upside Down." World Bank Publications, 2020. https://www.worldbank.org/en/country/kenya/publication/kenya-economic-update
  4. Kenya Institute for Public Policy Research and Analysis. "County Government Budget Analysis." https://www.kippra.or.ke