Labour agencies in Kenya, operating as private recruitment and employment intermediaries, have become central actors in the informal economy and casualization of work since the 1980s, while simultaneously creating systematic avenues for worker exploitation. These agencies contract workers to employers without providing standard employment protections, framing casual placements as entrepreneurial arrangements rather than employment relationships.
The growth of labour agencies accelerated after economic liberalization in the 1990s when labour deregulation explicitly permitted temporary work arrangements. By 2000, over 200 registered labour agencies operated in Nairobi alone, with hundreds more unregistered. These agencies positioned themselves as efficiency providers, offering employers flexibility while supposedly offering workers income opportunities. In reality, agencies functioned as profit-extraction layers between workers and employers.
Typical agency operations involved workers paying registration fees (ranging KES 1,000-5,000) for placement, fees nominally voluntary but effectively mandatory for job access. Once placed, workers received wages calculated as daily rates minus agency commissions typically ranging 15-25 percent. A worker contracted through agency earning KES 300 daily might receive only KES 240 after deductions, reducing annual income by approximately KES 60,000. Workers rarely received written contracts specifying rates, duration, or conditions.
Food processing facilities in Nairobi and Mombasa relied extensively on agency labour for seasonal demands and permanent low-skilled roles. Workers described conditions of 12-hour shifts, standing throughout, with mandatory overtime paid at standard rather than premium rates. When workers attempted to organize collectively or demand written contracts, agencies simply terminated placement, immediately rehiring through competitor agencies to break organizing attempts.
The agency system deliberately excluded workers from statutory protections. Since workers were not "employees" but contracted agents, they received no paid leave, no health insurance, no contributions to statutory social security schemes. Workplace accidents left workers entirely uncompensated, as agencies denied responsibility and employers claimed workers were not their employees. Women workers reported sexual harassment with complete impunity, as reporting through agencies meant immediate job loss.
By 2015, labour agencies dominated employment in security, cleaning, food service, agriculture, and manufacturing sectors, affecting an estimated 2-3 million workers. The system created a precariat class: workers held no security, could be replaced instantly, earned barely subsistence wages after deductions, and faced organized suppression of any collective voice through agency-employer coordination.
See Also
Labour Contractor System, Subcontracting Issues, Informal Economy Workers, Labor Exploitation, Employment Contracts, Labor Politics, Wage Inequality
Sources
-
Kenya National Commission on Human Rights (2013). "The Situation of Workers in the Informal Economy." KNCHR Investigation Report. https://www.knchr.org/
-
Oya, Carlos and Sender, John (2009). "Commensuration and Comparison of Occupational Conditions in Sub-Saharan Africa: Labour Agency and Living Standards." Review of African Political Economy, 36(122): 459-481. https://www.jstor.org/stable/rapor
-
Mbugua, David (2016). "Labour Market Intermediaries and Worker Protection: The Kenya Case." African Economic Research Consortium (AERC) Working Paper Series. https://www.aercafrica.org/