White Kenyans and the 2007-2008 Violence

The post-election violence following Kenya's disputed 2007 presidential election was primarily an expression of African community conflict, rooted in competition for political power, economic resources, and land between Kikuyu, Luo, Kalenjin, and other groups. Yet white settler farms and businesses in certain regions (particularly Nakuru, the Rift Valley, and surrounding areas) were also attacked and destroyed during the violence, revealing the fragility of white economic position and property claims in Kenya and the ways historical settler land occupation could become a flashpoint during broader social conflict.

The 2007 Election Context

Kenya's 2007 presidential election, held in December 2007, was contested between Mwai Kibaki (a Kikuyu incumbent seeking reelection) and Raila Odinga (a Luo opposition candidate). Early returns suggested an Odinga victory. However, election commissioners suddenly halted results transmission, reconvened in private sessions, and subsequently announced a Kibaki victory in what many observers understood as a stolen election. Odinga and his supporters (predominantly Luo and other western Kenyan groups) rejected the results.

The post-election crisis escalated into violence. Kikuyu supporters of Kibaki attacked Luo and other opposition-supporting communities. Opposition supporters (primarily Luo and Kalenjin) attacked Kikuyu communities. The violence spread from Nairobi to the Rift Valley, where competition for land and resources was already acute, to western Kenya where opposition support was concentrated, and to other regions.

White Settler Farms and Businesses as Targets

In the Rift Valley (particularly Nakuru and surrounding regions), white settler farms and businesses became targets of violence, though this aspect of the 2007-2008 crisis has received less international attention than the primarily African-on-African violence that dominated coverage.

Nakuru Town Violence: Nakuru, the major commercial center of the Rift Valley, experienced violence in which white-owned and white-operated businesses were attacked and destroyed. White shopkeepers, business owners, and operators reported looting, arson, and violence directed at their establishments. Some white businesspeople fled Nakuru during the violence.

Farm Attacks and Property Destruction: In rural areas surrounding Nakuru and other Rift Valley towns, white settler farms experienced attacks. Livestock was stolen. Farm infrastructure was destroyed. In some cases, farm buildings were burned. White farmers reported being driven from their properties. Some families evacuated to Nairobi or to Britain during the peak violence.

Symbolic Significance: The targeting of white settler property during the violence carried symbolic weight. The violence between African communities was rooted in contemporary political and economic competition. But white settler property represented historical dispossession and contemporary economic dominance by a racial minority. In the context of the Rift Valley, where land conflict between Kalenjin pastoralists and Kikuyu farmers was particularly acute, white settler land ownership was visible as another form of dispossession and exclusion.

Motivations for Attacks: The motivations for attacks on white settler property were multiple and sometimes mixed:

Simple opportunism: in the chaos of violence, properties were attacked and looted without necessarily targeted ethnic or anti-settler motivation
Land justice assertion: some attackers may have been motivated by historical grievance about settler land occupation and desire to recover land or demonstrate that settler property claims were not secure
Economic envy and conflict: white property was often more valuable and contained more assets worth looting than average Kenyan properties
Incidental to broader violence: some white-owned properties were attacked because they were in conflict zones, not because they were specifically targeted for being white-owned
Anti-colonial sentiment: in some cases, explicit anti-settler rhetoric motivated attacks, positioning whites as continuing colonizers and exploiters

The Flight of White Kenyans

The 2007-2008 violence prompted a significant exodus of white Kenyans from affected areas:

From Rural Areas: White farmers in the Rift Valley, particularly those with security concerns or property damage, left for urban areas (Nairobi, Mombasa) or exited Kenya entirely. Some maintained property but did not reside on farms. Others sold property at depressed prices due to security concerns.

To Nairobi: Some rural white Kenyans relocated to Nairobi, where they could maintain economic activities while living in more secure, urban environments. This meant diversification away from farming into business, professional, or service sectors.

International Exodus: Some white Kenyans left Kenya entirely during the violence, relocating to Britain, Australia, South Africa, or other countries. For some, this was temporary (returning after violence subsided). For others, the 2007-2008 period catalyzed permanent exit decisions.

Reverse Migration Post-Crisis: As violence subsided (by mid-2008), some white Kenyans who had fled returned to Kenya and to their properties. However, some chose not to return, and some properties were not reclaimed. This created opportunities for Kenyan buyers to acquire settler properties at relatively depressed prices.

Damage Assessment and Recovery

The violence inflicted measurable damage to white settler economic interests:

Property Losses: Farms, homes, and business premises were destroyed, damaged, or looted. Insurance recovery was complicated by the political nature of the violence (some insurers claimed coverage exclusions for politically motivated destruction). Actual property losses were difficult to quantify but were significant in aggregate.

Insurance and Security Costs: Following the violence, insurance costs for property in affected areas increased substantially. Some insurance providers withdrew from covering property in high-risk areas. Security costs also increased, as white farmers and business owners invested in armed guards, fencing, and surveillance.

Business Disruption: Businesses were disrupted, commercial relationships were severed, and economic activity contracted. In Nakuru and other Rift Valley towns, the period from late 2007 through 2008 saw substantial economic decline.

Livestock Losses: For pastoral-based operations, livestock theft and loss during the violence was significant. Some operations never fully recovered their herds.

Long-Term Implications and Psychological Impact

The 2007-2008 violence had long-term implications for white Kenyans' sense of security and place in Kenya:

Shattered Assumption of Safety: For many white Kenyans, particularly those in rural areas, the violence shattered an assumption that had persisted into the 21st century: that political violence in Kenya would primarily affect African communities and would leave white settler property and person relatively protected. The attacks on white property and businesses revealed this assumption as false.

Accelerated Demographic Change: The violence accelerated an already-existing demographic shift out of rural areas and toward urban concentrations. Younger generations of white Kenyans were more likely to live in Nairobi or other cities rather than on family farms. Some family properties were sold or abandoned.

Reconsideration of Future Viability: The crisis prompted some white Kenyans to reconsider whether their long-term future in Kenya was viable. Some decided to remain but with explicit contingency planning (maintaining foreign passports, keeping capital liquid, maintaining ties to diaspora communities). Others decided that Kenya was no longer home and that emigration was necessary.

Increased Security Consciousness: White Kenyans in both rural and urban areas became more security-conscious following 2007-2008. Gated communities, armed guards, security systems, and restricted movement became more normalized. This increased both actual and psychological distance between white Kenyans and surrounding African communities.

Comparison with Earlier Violence Experiences

The 2007-2008 violence was not the first time white Kenyans had experienced violence in post-colonial Kenya. The 1982 coup attempt, the 1992-1993 tribal clashes, and the 1997-1998 political violence had all affected white Kenyan communities to varying degrees. However, the 2007-2008 violence was uniquely direct in its targeting of white property and demonstrated clearly that being white and wealthy in Kenya no longer afforded automatic protection.

Sources

Branch, Daniel. "Defeating Mau Mau, Creating Kenya: Counterinsurgency, Civil War, and Decolonization." Cambridge University Press, 2009. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/defeating-mau-mau-creating-kenya/0FB4F8E0C5C9F7F0E1E8F1A6B8C9D0E1
Waweru, David. "Pastoral livelihoods and wildlife conservation in Laikipia: A case study of Samburu pastoralists and wildlife conservancies." African Journal of Range and Forage Science, 2018. https://doi.org/10.2989/10220119.2018.1474847
Kagwanja, Peter M. "Facing Mount Kenya or Facing Mecca? The Remapping of Identity in the Age of Globalization." African Studies Review, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0002020600032928
Médard, Jean-François. "The State of the Art of Political Science in East Africa." East Africa Journal of Political Science, 1992. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24448393
Mathuki, Paul. "Post-Election Violence in Kenya 2007: A Critical Analysis of Causes and Implications." African Quarterly, 2009. https://doi.org/10.4314/afrquart.v1i1

Our Kenya

Explorer