European-founded and European-led conservation organizations have played major roles in managing Kenya's wildlife and protected areas since the colonial period. Organizations including the African Wildlife Foundation (AWF), the David Sheldrick Wildlife Trust, the Born Free Foundation, and others control significant land and resources. However, scholars and African critics argue that conservation by Europeans represents a continuation of colonial land control, excluding African communities from resource access and decision-making.
Major European-Founded Organizations
African Wildlife Foundation (AWF)
The AWF was established in 1961 (before Kenyan independence) by American conservationists. It has become one of the largest conservation organizations working in Africa. AWF manages large land areas, conducts wildlife research, and works on conservation policy across East Africa.
David Sheldrick Wildlife Trust
Founded by David Sheldrick (British game warden) and expanded by his wife Daphne, the DSWT operates Tsavo National Park's orphaned elephant program and works on wildlife protection. The trust is internationally known for its work with elephants.
Born Free Foundation
Founded by actress Virginia McKenna and others, Born Free campaigns against animal captivity and supports wildlife conservation, particularly in Africa.
Other Organizations
Numerous other European-run or European-founded conservation organizations operate in Kenya, managing land, conducting research, and implementing conservation programs.
Conservation and Land Control
European conservation organizations control significant Kenyan land through:
-
National Park Management: Partnerships in managing Kenya's national parks and protected areas.
-
Private Conservancies: Ownership or management of large private conservation areas in regions like Laikipia and the Rift Valley.
-
Community Conservancies: Management of conservancies that control pastoral land in the name of wildlife and community benefit.
The amount of land under European conservation organizations' control is substantial. This land is often restricted from local human use, reserved for wildlife and tourism.
Conservation Goals and Methods
European conservation organizations typically prioritize:
-
Wildlife Protection: Prevention of poaching and habitat preservation.
-
Habitat Restoration: Restoration of ecosystems degraded by human use or colonialism.
-
Scientific Research: Ecological research to inform conservation.
-
Environmental Education: Education about conservation for schools and communities.
These goals are generally supported, but the methods and priorities are contested.
The Colonial Continuation Critique
Critical scholars argue that European conservation represents a continuation of colonial land control under a different justification:
-
Land Exclusion: Just as colonial reserves excluded Africans from land, conservation areas exclude or restrict local communities' resource access.
-
Externally-Driven Priorities: Conservation priorities (protecting wildlife, preserving ecosystems) are set by external organizations, not by local communities.
-
Resource Extraction: Conservation areas generate resources (tourism revenue, research funding) that benefit external organizations more than local communities.
-
Indigenous Knowledge Dismissal: Traditional ecological knowledge and practices are often dismissed in favor of European scientific conservation.
-
Profit Motive: While framed as non-profit, conservation organizations generate significant revenue from tourism, grants, and donations.
Community Impact
Conservation activities have mixed impacts on local communities:
-
Benefit: Tourism revenue, employment in conservation work, and habitat protection provide benefits.
-
Restriction: Local communities often lose access to hunting, grazing, and harvesting that sustained them before conservation areas were established.
-
Conflict: Conservation enforcement (anti-poaching operations, restrictions on movement) can be violent and oppressive.
-
Marginalization: Local communities are often excluded from conservation decision-making, making conservation policies outside their control.
European Conservation Leaders
Individual Europeans have left marks on Kenya's conservation:
-
David Sheldrick: Pioneering wildlife veterinarian and conservationist.
-
Richard Leakey: Paleoanthropologist and conservation leader (though of mixed nationality, prominently associated with Western conservation).
-
Ian Parker: Elephant expert and conservationist.
-
Various others: Scientists, researchers, and conservationists from Europe and elsewhere have contributed to Kenya's conservation institutions.
These individuals are celebrated for conservation work, but also criticized for perpetuating external control of African environments.
Post-Colonial Evolution
Post-independence, European conservation organizations have had to negotiate with Kenya's government and communities:
-
Government Partnerships: Conservation organizations work with the Kenya Wildlife Service (government) on park management.
-
Community Engagement: Increasing emphasis on community benefits and community participation (though with continued external control).
-
Africanization: Growing number of African conservation professionals, though leadership often remains European or Western.
Contested Legacy
The European conservation establishment's legacy in Kenya is contested. Some argue it has:
-
Protected Wildlife: Conservation organizations have prevented extinction and habitat loss.
-
Generated Revenue: Tourism from protected areas contributes to Kenya's economy.
-
Employed Kenyans: Conservation work provides employment.
Others argue it has:
-
Perpetuated Colonialism: Land exclusion and external control continue colonial patterns.
-
Marginalized Communities: Local communities are excluded from decision-making and resource benefit.
-
Distorted Priorities: Western priorities (wildlife protection, Western tourists) take precedence over local needs.
The truth likely involves elements of both assessment. Conservation has prevented environmental catastrophe, but has also perpetuated external control and community marginalization.
See Also
- Joy and George Adamson - Conservation pioneers
- Kuki Gallmann - Contemporary conservationist
- Wildlife Conservation in Kenya - Broader conservation history
- David Sheldrick Wildlife Trust - Individual organization example
- Laikipia Ranch Families - Conservation and land conflicts
- Land Restitution Debate - Questions about conservation land
- Europeans who Stayed - Conservationists remaining post-independence
- Community-Based Conservation - Alternative conservation models