Our Kenya

SGR Procurement Opacity

4 min read

The Standard Gauge Railway Project

The Standard Gauge Railway (SGR) is a modern railway connecting Mombasa (on the coast) to Nairobi (the capital). The railway was designed for both passenger and freight transport.

The project was conceived as part of Kenya's infrastructure development strategy. It was intended to improve transportation efficiency between the coast and the interior and to facilitate trade.

The Procurement Process

The contract for constructing the SGR was awarded to China Road and Bridge Corporation (CRBC), a Chinese state-owned construction company.

The procurement process for the SGR was unusual in several respects:

  • Government-to-government arrangement: Rather than a competitive international bid, the contract was negotiated directly between the Kenyan government and the Chinese government
  • Bypassed standard procurement: Kenya's Public Procurement and Asset Disposal Act requires competitive bidding for major government contracts. The SGR appeared to bypass these requirements
  • Loan financing: The Kenyan government financed the SGR through loans from China's Export-Import Bank (EXIM Bank)
  • Linked package: The loan was conditional on awarding the contract to CRBC

This arrangement meant that the procurement process lacked the competitive discipline that public procurement rules are designed to ensure.

Cost Concerns

The estimated cost of the first phase of the SGR (Mombasa to Nairobi, approximately 480 kilometers) was approximately USD 3.8-5.2 billion.

This cost was substantially higher than comparable railway projects in developing countries. For example:

  • Ethiopian Railway (Addis Ababa to Djibouti, 656 km): approximately USD 5 billion (higher total cost for longer distance)
  • South African Durban-Port Elizabeth railway: comparable per-kilometer costs

The higher-than-expected cost raised questions about whether the SGR contract was inflated. Critics suggested that:

  • CRBC overpriced the contract, knowing that China was financing the project
  • The Kenyan government was not equipped to conduct independent cost analysis
  • Corruption may have inflated the costs (kickbacks to Kenyan officials for approving the overpriced contract)

No independent cost audit was conducted before contract signature, and the contract terms were not publicly disclosed.

Financial Sustainability Concerns

By the early 2020s, the SGR had become operational but was facing financial difficulties. The railway was not generating sufficient revenue to cover operating costs and service its debt.

The Kenyan government had to provide subsidies to keep the railway operating. This was financially unsustainable for a developing country with limited fiscal resources.

The financial unsustainability of the SGR raised questions about whether:

  • The project had been properly assessed for financial viability before undertaking it
  • The government understood the long-term financial commitments it was making
  • The high cost of the SGR reflected inefficiency or corruption

Debt Burden

Kenya took on approximately USD 3-5 billion in external debt to finance the SGR. This debt obligation had to be serviced (repayment with interest) for decades.

The large debt burden for a single project constrained Kenya's fiscal space for other investments. Schools, hospitals, and other services could not be adequately funded because resources were being allocated to debt service.

Lack of Transparency

The terms of the CRBC contract were not publicly disclosed. The specific performance standards, cost breakdowns, timeline, and penalty clauses (if CRBC failed to deliver) were kept confidential.

This lack of transparency prevented public scrutiny of the contract and prevented any assessment of whether the government had negotiated favorable terms.

See Also

Sources

  1. Parliamentary Committee on Finance. "Inquiry into SGR Procurement and Costs." Parliament of Kenya, 2018. https://parliament.go.ke
  2. World Bank. "Kenya Transport Sector Review: SGR Project Assessment." World Bank, 2017. https://www.worldbank.org
  3. International Monetary Fund. "Kenya Article IV Consultation: Debt Sustainability Analysis." IMF, 2018. https://www.imf.org
  4. Transparency International. "Procurement Integrity in Large-Scale Infrastructure: The SGR Case." 2017. https://www.transparency.org
  5. Daily Nation. "SGR Costs: Inflated or Fair? Investigation into CRBC Contract." News archives. https://www.nation.co.ke

Backlinks